Page briefing (audio)
Seven-minute walkthrough of this page: what copy trading is, why it fails, the paper test design, and all eight candidates with their yellow flags.
Admin · Copy trading
Alternate route · 2026-10-01
Paper test · in progress Was: evaluated · not adopted
Seven-minute walkthrough of this page: what copy trading is, why it fails, the paper test design, and all eight candidates with their yellow flags.
Find traders with real track records on copy platforms, mirror their trades into your own account automatically. One trader, fifteen traders, fifteen hundred. The plumbing into MT5 exists: MQL5 Signals, local copier EAs, cloud copiers. The mechanics work.
Do not copy one leaderboard winner. Do not aggregate 1,500 blindly. The only defensible version: use the crowd as a discovery universe, narrow to 8 to 15 genuinely independent strategies, paper-test them with strict gates. That is a research project, not a shortcut.
Objective. Find out whether a small filtered portfolio of strategies can clear BFG-style gates over 3 months. This tests the selection method, not a shortcut.
Why observational. MQL5 removed free signals and disabled signal subscriptions on demo accounts entirely (build 4150, Feb 2024). Copying any MQL5 signal now requires a funded live account plus $30+/mo per signal. So this test tracks public signal statistics without subscribing to anything. No accounts connected, no subscriptions, no capital moved, ever.
Method. Candidates are selected from public MQL5 MT5 signal pages (subscription price is irrelevant since nothing is subscribed). Published growth, equity, max drawdown, and profit factor are snapshotted weekly. Selection gates apply at entry; kill rules apply to published equity over time.
Selection gates. Every candidate must pass all of these:
Portfolio rules. 8 to 15 strategies that pass the gates. Spread across different instruments and styles for genuine independence, not fifteen gold scalpers.
Kill rules. Any signal whose published equity falls 15% below its starting snapshot is dropped from tracking immediately. Monthly review: at 3 months, keep only signals still positive with profit factor above 1.0.
Honest limits. This measures whether the filtering method picks durable strategies. It cannot measure copy slippage, execution fidelity, or subscription drag, because nothing is actually copied. A positive verdict here would justify a small paid copy test later, not live capital.
Budget. $0. No subscriptions, no live capital at any point in this test.
Timeline. 3-month observational track, then a verdict: did the filtered crowd clear the gates or not.
Selection outcome. 32 candidates were reviewed against the six gates. Six passed cleanly; two more are included as conditional candidates with their warnings intact (EUR Trader and Different gold strategies 1). The strict universe did not produce eight unconditional passes, so this is 6 full passes plus 2 conditional, not eight clean qualifiers.
Loading shortlist…
| # | Signal | Instrument & style | Entry stats | Win rate | Status | Yellow flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||||||
Restricted
Type the password to enter.